News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Relic files S-1 for IPO by dkhenry on Monday November 10, 2014 @09:16PM (#8587907)
Is it just me or do those numbers look really bad for a software company.

They spend as much on General Administrative as they do on R&D and they spend 3.6x , more on marketing and sales then they do on R&D.

Re:New Relic files S-1 for IPO by spullara on Monday November 10, 2014 @09:24PM (#8587936)
Enterprise software companies spend a very small amount on R&D. Usually < 15%: http://www.zdnet.com/r-and-d-spend-critical-but-no-fixed-for...
Re:New Relic files S-1 for IPO by dkhenry on Monday November 10, 2014 @09:47PM (#8588011)
I didn't really think of New Relic as "Enterprise Software". They are a SaaS Company. Most of the reason enterprise software has so little R&D is because they spend all their resources customizing deployments for enterprise customers.
Re:New Relic files S-1 for IPO by chii on Monday November 10, 2014 @11:24PM (#8588284)
i think enterprise and SaaS are orthogonal descriptions. new relic is definitely enterprise - as opposed to consumer (ala, dropbox). That their product is a SaaS offering doesn't really make any difference.
Re:New Relic files S-1 for IPO by mblevin on Tuesday November 11, 2014 @10:56AM (#8590420)
You're talking about two different dimensions.

Enterprise and consumer run along one axis (B2C vs B2B), self-serve vs custom deployment on the other axis (low friction vs high friction)

Much of the innovation we've seen in B2B has not just been the consumerization of the interface but also the move to self-service models.

Re:New Relic files S-1 for IPO by pbreit on Tuesday November 11, 2014 @02:36AM (#8588746)
It's you. For all the large and growing enterprise software companies you're going to see very heavy sales & marketing.

For example, Zendesk was nearly identical: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1463172/0001193125141...