Re:Red Hat Asks Supreme Court to Review Software Patents
by stcredzero on Friday October 02, 2009 @08:40AM
(#856881)
The value is that it helps you cement the value of your business with potential investors and the bank, it establishes credibility when marketing yourself to customers.
In other words: a legal cudgel, often useful to business people and often useful to startups. I'm sure the economy does not benefit from the ensuing posturing and cudgeling, but I can see why someone would see having one in their self interest.
I think you could cut out a lot of software patent trolling if you required a working device to be submitted. With the widespread availability of small, cheap, microprocessors, this wouldn't be an insurmountable requirement for individuals. Also, it would make silly software patents like "One-Click" less straightforward to apply for. (Amazon: this box implements the "One-Click" functionality. Reviewer: how can I make it work? Amazon: well, it has to be plugged into our test data-center.)
I'm fundamentally opposed to them, but the reality is that they exist. Because of this, I found myself organising patent protection for our software.
If they are abolished, I'll be upset about my £8k investment - but more happy that sanity has prevailed.