News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Assembly for XML by OhHeyItsE on Thursday October 30, 2014 @02:56PM (#8535008)
For the coder who looks at XML and says "This isn't quite difficult enough to work with already. There must be another way!"
Re:Assembly for XML by chc on Thursday October 30, 2014 @03:58PM (#8535449)
To be honest, the author is not wrong. It does look easier than XSLT.
Re:Assembly for XML by wtetzner on Thursday October 30, 2014 @05:04PM (#8535811)
But it doesn't look easier than XQuery.
Re:Assembly for XML by masklinn on Friday October 31, 2014 @04:55AM (#8537862)
> It does look easier than XSLT.

Not really. It may look more familiar if you can only think procedurally.

Re:Assembly for XML by yegor256a on Friday October 31, 2014 @05:06AM (#8537886)
Not just difficult, but verbose. XML/DOM manipulations are very verbose, especially in Java. Xembly make them very simple and compact.
Re:Assembly for XML by CmonDev on Friday October 31, 2014 @05:07AM (#8537891)
XML is not difficult to work with though.