hmm ,i guess he is talking about Alan Turing who was literaly sentenced to a horrible treatment for being gay.

That's one of the greatest shame of UK,it symbolizes bigotery in its purest form.

It was one of our (many) great failings and as a nation we have accepted that:

Prime Ministers Apology: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/11/pm-apology-to-a...

Royal Pardon: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-two/10536246/Al...

Is it possible to knight someone posthumously? Has this happened?

No. No. In fact, in past times ( of kings and queens), one man was killed in a battle and his brother was given a much higher title because you cannot give the honorable title to a deceased individual.

Not only can you not knight deceased people, but when knights die they lose their title. #QuiteInteresting. #whenwillhnsupporthashtags.

Well, at least there's that.

Compared to which country that has never persecuted anyone for being gay?

This isnt a bigotery contest hey? I was talking from the point of view of someone who has the greatest respect for what Turing has done.I mean that's a shame that everything he has done for his country mattered very little when he was judged for being gay.

Bigotry is a wrong word to use (afaik) in a historical context. It simply means 'what we consider unacceptable by today's social norms'.

It was absolutely stupid and unjust (since most upper classes were involved in buggery in school anyways) - but calling it bigoted is like saying 'it was so yellow of them to do'.

OK, maybe I mis-read your original comment. It came across as being very anti-UK:

"That's one of the greatest shame of UK,it symbolizes bigotery in its purest form."

but I accept I might have read stronger sentiment into that than was intended.

I think he is talking about Alan Turing.

On one hand, we have a man who worked with the Nazis, and on the other, we have a man persecuted and chemically castrated by the British government for his sexual orientation, who many believe committed suicide as a result.