News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by joelrunyon on Tuesday October 28, 2014 @09:43PM (#8525010)
Here's his statement on twitter from today: "Sorry to hear about the @OrbitalSciences launch. Hope they recover soon"

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/527247155954610176

Was he speaking facts? Because if they were using rockets made in the 60s - he's not really badmouthing them as much as he is making public facts.

Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by Lambdanaut on Tuesday October 28, 2014 @09:47PM (#8525024)
Comparing their rockets to "the punchline of a joke" is definitely bad mouthing, just factual badmouthing.

Despite that, I don't blame him. Being factual is what's important.

Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by avmich on Tuesday October 28, 2014 @10:40PM (#8525214)
And of course it's ridiculous that engines like NK-33 are considered bad just because they sit in a hangar for some 40+ years :) . It's not milk, they aren't that easily spoiled. Elon just used this time reference to make the decision look good - for somebody who doesn't know better.

So factually he's right - but also misses the point. Here I should admit that Elon says more than he does - but he does quite a bit too, so kudos to his successes - Merlin-1D is a great engine.

Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by justin66 on Wednesday October 29, 2014 @08:18AM (#8526740)
> And of course it's ridiculous that engines like NK-33 are considered bad just because they sit in a hangar for some 40+ years

I took his comment to be more in the "that's your business model? buying and selling old Russian hardware?" vein. It's not that the hardware is bad, per se.

Although the hardware might be bad. I imagine they're looking into that...

Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by ramidarigaz on Wednesday October 29, 2014 @01:53AM (#8525777)
It's not that they've been sitting in a hangar for decades so much as that we've gotten a lot better at building engines. Presumably modern designs have a lot lower catastrophic fault probability.
Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by avmich on Tuesday October 28, 2014 @10:37PM (#8525199)
I think technically engines were manufactured in early '70s - like, in 1974? Definitely weren't stored in Siberia - Russia has quite sizable European part, no need to go to Siberia if you want to hide about 70 engines from nemesis Glushko's eye...
Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by readerrrr on Tuesday October 28, 2014 @11:12PM (#8525319)
They were stored in Samara, Russia. Maps say that is in Siberia.
Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by tanzam75 on Wednesday October 29, 2014 @02:41AM (#8525880)
> They were stored in Samara, Russia. Maps say that is in Siberia.

Samara is not in Siberia. It is in the Volga Federal District, which is west of the Urals and therefore in European Russia.

In fact, Samara is 1000 miles away from Siberia. Even for Russia, that's still quite a distance.

Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by x4m on Wednesday October 29, 2014 @02:13AM (#8525827)
Samara is in european part of Russia. Siberia starts from Novosibirsk, it's about 2k miles to East from Samara.
Re:Orbital Sciences Antares rocket explodes after liftoff by tanzam75 on Wednesday October 29, 2014 @02:51AM (#8525896)
> Siberia starts from Novosibirsk, it's about 2k miles to East from Samara.

Omsk is in Siberia and it's only 1000 miles away from Samara.

Anyway, Los Angeles is not in Oregon, Moscow is not in Germany, and Samara is not in Siberia.