Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi...
by fnordfnordfnord on Sunday October 26, 2014 @06:26PM
(#8512742)
>It's a very different Gates from the philanthrope we see today, but back in the 90ties he was a bit of a dick.
IMO Gates the businessman is just a ruthlessly competitive adversary. I don't even see a conflict between him then and his philanthropic activities now.
It was also covered pretty well at Groklaw http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107...
Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi...
by thomasahle on Sunday October 26, 2014 @07:49PM
(#8513031)
> IMO Gates the businessman is just a ruthlessly competitive adversary.
Well, anticompetitive adversary.
> I don't even see a conflict between him then and his philanthropic activities now.
He certainly seems to be pretty good at both jobs.
Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi...
by fnordfnordfnord on Sunday October 26, 2014 @08:14PM
(#8513115)
>Well, anticompetitive adversary.
Touche
>He certainly seems to be pretty good at both jobs.
I agree, and I am glad he gave us a likeable trait within his lifetime, unlike many of his robber-baron contemporaries and predecessors.
> "Do we have a clear plan on what we want Apple to do to undermine Sun?"
> "I want to get as much mileage as possible out of our browser and Java relationship here. In other words, a real advantage against Sun and Netscape."
And in a conversation Bill participated in:
> "Apple wants to keep both Netscape and Microsoft developing browsers for Mac -- believing if one drops out, the other will lose interest (and also not really wanting to pick up the development burden.) Getting Apple to do anything that significantly/materially disadvantages Netscape will be tough. Do agree that Apple should be meeting - the spirit of our cross license agreement and that Macoffice is the perfect club to use on them."
It's a very different Gates from the philanthrope we see today, but back in the 90ties he was a bit of a dick.
It's a bit slow to watch it all, but the entire thing appears to be transcribed here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/longterm/micro...