News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a deposition (1998) [video].

Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi... by dorafmon on Sunday October 26, 2014 @04:22PM (#8512242)
Can anyone explain why the lawyer is so keen on making Bill Gates to confirm that he thought that Java is a competitive threat?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi... by twoodfin on Sunday October 26, 2014 @05:34PM (#8512547)
At the time, Microsoft's licensing disagreement with Sun over Java frameworks and integration with native code had some overlap with the DoJ's case: Was Microsoft attempting to eliminate a threat to their Windows monopoly with "embrace, extend & extinguish"?

I think the government ultimately dropped that angle.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi... by johnchristopher on Sunday October 26, 2014 @04:26PM (#8512260)
IANAL but I suppose it is to paint a certain picture of BG's intentions regarding Java which would be then used to motivate the decision of the judge/jurors [0].

[0] Your legal system may varies but it's often about judging the intention and then the consequences.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi... by dorafmon on Sunday October 26, 2014 @04:30PM (#8512277)
So it can be used against him? How?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bill Gates answers questions about Java during a depositi... by johnchristopher on Sunday October 26, 2014 @06:54PM (#8512842)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_in_English_law

If the lawyer can prove or make BG admits JAVA is a threat then BG's actions against JAVA can be seen as deliberate rather than accidental or unfortunate.

Because the "Oops I didn't think tweaking JAVA API so it works only on Windows would hurt SUN that is trying to sell a JAVA thingie that works everywhere" card wouldn't work that well and it would established deliberate questionable practice.

In this case it might or might not be something like that.

[ Parent | on HN ]