News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by aptwebapps on Thursday October 23, 2014 @11:31PM (#8502015)
"its all in the mind of the receiver (aka psychological)"

Two points:

1) Except when it isn't. 2) Isn't that enough? What are we, robots? It's true that some people might be able to treat the two things the same and not be affected, but they're a tiny minority. Harm is harm, even if you think that everyone should have thicker skin.

Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by Natsu on Friday October 24, 2014 @02:17AM (#8502353)
@yummyfajitas - it appears that all of your posts are dead right now. I'm not clear if you've been banned after many downvotes or what, but the last several posts are all dead now.
Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by dang on Friday October 24, 2014 @02:40AM (#8502394)
Yummyfajitas isn't banned. Some of his comments are being flagged by users.
Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by Natsu on Friday October 24, 2014 @10:47PM (#8507023)
I just noticed that I now see [flagkilled] instead of [dead] some places. Is that new? And if so, I'm guessing it was not applied retroactively?

Just curious, because it looks like you're trying to be more transparent and I applaud that.

Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by dang on Saturday October 25, 2014 @01:50AM (#8507338)
Yes, it's a week or so old and means that user flags killed a story or comment.

I don't understand your question about retroactiveness; can you explain?

Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by waterlesscloud on Saturday October 25, 2014 @03:01AM (#8507460)
Has there been a change to the number of downvotes needed to make a post "dead"? I've had showdead on forever, and it feels like I'm seeing many more posts that have been deaded by voting alone.
Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by Natsu on Saturday October 25, 2014 @02:14AM (#8507375)
Essentially I'm asking if it applies to all posts or only posts after the feature was added.
Re:A Natural A/B Test of Harassment by Natsu on Friday October 24, 2014 @02:45AM (#8502405)
Thanks for clarifying. I was wondering if he'd tripped something automatic.