News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:VC failure rates by sanj on Friday November 30, 2007 @11:08AM (#85017)
There are a few data points missing from this analysis: like over what timeframe the 5x returns were realized:

I can get that over 20 years with an 8% return!

Re:VC failure rates by far33d on Friday November 30, 2007 @12:25PM (#85047)
Most VC funds have a 10 year lifetime, so all investment returns are for some period less than that.
Re:VC failure rates by sethjohn on Friday November 30, 2007 @12:41PM (#85052)
Very good point, but it seems more likely that poorly performing companies have a rather short (several years) lifetime.
Re:VC failure rates by pg on Friday November 30, 2007 @01:16PM (#85064)
It's rare to get this kind of info out of a VC. I'm impressed with Fred's openness.
Re:VC failure rates by sethjohn on Friday November 30, 2007 @12:45PM (#85054)
How will the YC model compare?

I'd guess a higher percentage of failures and higher average return on the successful companies. (It's a lot easier to get 50X when you only invest $15K to start with!)

Re:VC failure rates by pchristensen on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:00PM (#85135)
From what PG has said (can't find the thread), most of the companies are still intact and the success rate is much higher than the average for VCs.
Re:VC failure rates by sethjohn on Friday December 07, 2007 @03:22PM (#87109)
Yeah, that could be right. Of course, "intact" doesn't mean that they will have a profitable exit.