Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Why pro-systemd and anti-systemd people will never get along. Parent comment
just a correction, red hat revenue is from support contracts.
> If systemd is bad for servers, why did RHEL[1] and CoreOS adopt it? Are we to believe that these companies work against themselves?
I know of two theories:
1) making systemd a dependency for gnome and the rest, red hat is trying to exterminate *bsd, which is considered better for servers.
2) "Software that ain't broken doesn't sell $$$upport. "
There are no comments on this comment yet.
just a correction, red hat revenue is from support contracts.
> If systemd is bad for servers, why did RHEL[1] and CoreOS adopt it? Are we to believe that these companies work against themselves?
I know of two theories:
1) making systemd a dependency for gnome and the rest, red hat is trying to exterminate *bsd, which is considered better for servers.
2) "Software that ain't broken doesn't sell $$$upport. "