Re:When Women Become Men at Wellesley
by chillingeffect on Thursday October 16, 2014 @06:45PM
(#8468315)
You and the parent are both absolutely correct, in real life.
It's just that iiuc, Wellesley doesn't sell "diversity," but "women."
Wellesley's failure to take a stance on having transmen around indicates hesitation and fear on their part (understandably so, imho) b/c who really knows - at this time - what is fair and just for their product case.
Do they count women who became men as women, b/c that's part of the female experience? Or do they count them as men, b/c they're not women? Who knows.
It's just that iiuc, Wellesley doesn't sell "diversity," but "women."
Wellesley's failure to take a stance on having transmen around indicates hesitation and fear on their part (understandably so, imho) b/c who really knows - at this time - what is fair and just for their product case.
Do they count women who became men as women, b/c that's part of the female experience? Or do they count them as men, b/c they're not women? Who knows.