Re:When Women Become Men at Wellesley
by chillingeffect on Thursday October 16, 2014 @06:45PM
(#8468315)
You and the parent are both absolutely correct, in real life.
It's just that iiuc, Wellesley doesn't sell "diversity," but "women."
Wellesley's failure to take a stance on having transmen around indicates hesitation and fear on their part (understandably so, imho) b/c who really knows - at this time - what is fair and just for their product case.
Do they count women who became men as women, b/c that's part of the female experience? Or do they count them as men, b/c they're not women? Who knows.
Re:When Women Become Men at Wellesley
by a8da6b0c91d on Friday October 17, 2014 @12:06AM
(#8469387)
"Diversity" is code for anti white discrimination. Whenever you hear the word "diversity" know that it very much means deliberate anti white racism. We destroy over 4% of GDP every year on "diversity."
I don't know about the "white" part, but putting a man in such a seat would seem to be more appropriate than putting a woman in it.
Doesn't anyone else remember what "diversity" means?