Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by tenfourty on Wednesday October 15, 2014 @10:17AM
(#8458497)
will Windows base images be made available on the Docker Hub? How will that work?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by nickstinemates on Wednesday October 15, 2014 @10:26AM
(#8458560)
> will Windows base images be made available on the Docker Hub?
Yes!
> How will that work?
The same way it works now. Find an image you want to run, and docker run it.
Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by tenfourty on Wednesday October 15, 2014 @10:32AM
(#8458596)
so Window's licences will be free?
Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by mbreese on Wednesday October 15, 2014 @10:39AM
(#8458630)
I suspect that you'd still need a Windows Server license to start off with. It may or may not need a VM under the hood, but that's a MS thing to figure out. They certainly couldn't license a container the same way as a full Windows VM or bare metal install.
Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by lightbritefight on Wednesday October 15, 2014 @12:38PM
(#8459501)
Id expect that since the idea is having your windows container running on a windows host, that each version of windows server will have a "this edition allows X number of containers" limit. This would line up with how they treat VMs. Lets hope the number is 5x the current VM limits.
Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by aruggirello on Thursday October 16, 2014 @04:43AM
(#8463989)
> Lets hope the number is 5x the current VM limits.
Why, let's open they are unlimited. :)
Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by nickstinemates on Wednesday October 15, 2014 @10:40AM
(#8458634)
Great question.
I'll be honest and say I don't have an answer. However, we're working on derive one and you'll know as soon as we do.
Re:Docker and Microsoft partner to drive adoption of distrib...
by scholia on Thursday October 16, 2014 @03:17PM
(#8466932)
I thought the whole point of containerization was that you ran apps in a container, but the container doesn't contain an operating system. (You have several containers on one instance of the OS, not several VMs, each with its own OS. That's how it works in Linux, anyway.)