Re:The Imminent Decentralized Computing Revolution
by woah on Sunday October 12, 2014 @09:27PM
(#8447154)
Proof of stake, while probably achievable technically within the next few years, has a major incentive problem. Anyone can show up and start mining a proof of work coin, and earn some. In contrast, all coins ever available in a proof of stake system must be given out by someone at some point. Most people distrust a system that claims to be decentralized, but has a central group or person giving out all tokens that will ever exist at the beginning.
Re:The Imminent Decentralized Computing Revolution
by wmf on Monday October 13, 2014 @12:12AM
(#8447455)
You have to buy hardware to mine. Arguably buying stake directly is simpler.
Re:The Imminent Decentralized Computing Revolution
by tg3 on Monday October 13, 2014 @03:50AM
(#8447854)
Simpler probably, but unless you can buy stake from anyone (like you can with hardware), it lacks the same decentralized advantages.
Re:The Imminent Decentralized Computing Revolution
by wmf on Tuesday October 14, 2014 @05:47PM
(#8456018)
In the Bitcoin world there are multiple exchanges and multiple ASIC vendors. Any healthy ecosystem should have multiple exchanges.
Re:The Imminent Decentralized Computing Revolution
by eric_bullington on Sunday October 12, 2014 @08:46PM
(#8447080)
What proof-of-stake blockchain is presently working and stable without checkpoints?
Are there any (serious question)?
Proof-of-work is expensive and will ultimately be replaced with better consensus schemes that require no mining, namely those that only rely on cryptographic signatures, a good balance of incentives and penalties, and an underlying byzantine consensus algorithm.
Disclaimer: I'm one of a handful of people working on new consensus algorithms.