Re:Alfred Anaya Put Secret Compartments in Cars. The DEA Put...
by NoMoreNicksLeft on Sunday October 12, 2014 @07:55PM
(#8446972)
Marijuana should be legal to possess, to produce, and to sell.
Shrooms should be legal to possess, to produce, and to sell.
Cocaine should be legal to possess, and to sell (perhaps licensed).
Heroin (and associated opiates) should be legal to possess, to produce, and to sell (perhaps only licensed sales).
Meth should be legal to possess, to produce (for large licensed companies), and to sell.
When I use the word "drugs" in the context of this conversation, I am referring to recreational drugs. I'm not necessarily saying that antibiotics should be available without prescription.
Rohypnol isn't a typical recreational drug. Considering that its only use seems to be covertly drugging third parties, I do not advocate that it be legal to buy or sell.
You definitely understood what I meant. You're fallaciously trying to find a counter-example that can be used to undermine my arguments.
Shrooms should be legal to possess, to produce, and to sell.
Cocaine should be legal to possess, and to sell (perhaps licensed).
Heroin (and associated opiates) should be legal to possess, to produce, and to sell (perhaps only licensed sales).
Meth should be legal to possess, to produce (for large licensed companies), and to sell.
When I use the word "drugs" in the context of this conversation, I am referring to recreational drugs. I'm not necessarily saying that antibiotics should be available without prescription.
Rohypnol isn't a typical recreational drug. Considering that its only use seems to be covertly drugging third parties, I do not advocate that it be legal to buy or sell.
You definitely understood what I meant. You're fallaciously trying to find a counter-example that can be used to undermine my arguments.