News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rich Command Shells by pjmlp on Friday October 10, 2014 @08:19AM (#8437327)
Except REPLs are CLIs on steroids.

UNIX shells can only seem powerful for those that never had the luxury of playing with Smalltalk, Lisp, Mesa/Cedar or Oberon environments.

Where you have a CLI and GUI experiences interact together to create a composable workflow experience.

Where I can do function composition on my REPL over data that I just selected with my mouse on a word processor, just to give a possible example.

Where public functions from dynamic modules are exposed on the REPL and can take part in any set of commands.

There is this primitive notion that a CLI needs to be the UNIX way, when a REPL as CLI is so much more powerful.

Re:Rich Command Shells by rkrzr on Friday October 10, 2014 @10:37AM (#8437900)
IPython already makes for a pretty good bash/zsh/etc replacement for many things. You can get a GUI using the IPython notebooks as well. While I haven't made the switch completely yet, I always keep an IPython session around in an extra tab, since it is very often just much simpler to do something there than in bash.
Re:Rich Command Shells by hollerith on Saturday October 11, 2014 @05:59AM (#8441738)
>I always keep an IPython session around in an extra tab

By "tab" you mean tab in your web browser; do you not? (I ask because there are non-web-based IPython thingies.)

Re:Rich Command Shells by rkrzr on Saturday October 11, 2014 @06:59AM (#8441824)
I actually meant a terminal tab (I'm using Tilda as terminal emulator). I'm only really using the web-based notebook interface when I need to display graphics for something.
Re:Rich Command Shells by hollerith on Saturday October 11, 2014 @11:19AM (#8442362)
I am very glad I asked :)