Re:Choosing a Web Framework: Django, Flask, or Pyramid
by raverbashing on Tuesday October 07, 2014 @12:46PM
(#8422225)
I agree, sure, you lose portability (or you can have a generic slower ORM case if it's that important) but dropping down to the SQL in corner cases is perfectly valid (and helpful)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Choosing a Web Framework: Django, Flask, or Pyramid
by gtaylor on Tuesday October 07, 2014 @12:50PM
(#8422249)
For many cases, portability is a complete non-issue. For example, at Pathwright we chose Postgres for a bunch of reasons. We don't care about MySQL or Oracle or SQL Server. If there ever came a point where we had to make a switch for some reason, it wouldn't be horrible to make the necessary changes to the smaller number of places that we use SQL.
Of course, portability could be more of a concern if you are writing something that you are going to let customers run on their own hardware/environment. Though even then, I'm not sure I'd want to have to deal with supporting customers using every DB server that Django supports...