Re:New cracks in Hunterston reactor
by gambiting on Tuesday October 07, 2014 @09:28AM
(#8420950)
Because it's not really a pressing problem. Spent nuclear waste can sit in a swimming pool of water for any amount of time without endangering anyone. And water is so good at shielding radiation that you can even swim in such a pool. After few years the waste is moved to outside casks which are also not a danger to anyone. The only real problem is protecting those places from terrorists and such. But then again we have burnt coal ash sitting in huge piles outside under clear sky, and I would argue they pollute a lot more than a spent nuclear fuel cask does.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
For me this looks like pressing enough: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/legacy-danger-old...
I hope that I am just hysterical and there is some solution planned since long time, and maybe there is totally no danger at all and we can continue for long time enjoying sea products from the channel.
But absolutely no one is dumping nuclear waste into the sea at the moment. It's something that has been done decades ago, so why would it be stopping us from using nuclear power nowadays?
Don't get me wrong - we've done huge damage to the environment by dumping our waste into seas, lakes and just general carelessness. But using that as an argument to stop using nuclear power now is.....illogical?