Re:Adobe joins the Chromebook party, starting with Photoshop
by pjmlp on Tuesday September 30, 2014 @03:13AM
(#8387075)
Networked apps running on the desktop != Terminals
Re:Adobe joins the Chromebook party, starting with Photoshop
by e12e on Tuesday September 30, 2014 @03:31AM
(#8387121)
True enough. But if everyone of those apps are just a poorly constructed X Server equivalent (nothing going on locally if the connection drops) ... the difference seems a little semantic?
Re:Adobe joins the Chromebook party, starting with Photoshop
by pjmlp on Tuesday September 30, 2014 @04:39AM
(#8387270)
Yeah, but usually that is not the case with proper desktop applications.
The one thing I could see giving a resurgence to "off-line" for mainstream use, is latency -- more concretely -- the low latency tolerance of VR. But then again, as long as you can stream enough data/logic to the "terminal" -- even that shouldn't be a problem.
I do hope the industry can help shift things towards locally cacheable/locally hostable solutions, though. I'd much rather run some "cloud" office suite on my server, with the option of taking it with me off-line from time to time (and then perhaps sync up whenever I'm on-line) -- than having my data on a third-party server. Or servers.
I'm afraid the more likely future, is a future where a majority of users are locked-in to the whims of mega-corps -- and the scariest part of that, is that those that are leading in providing "cloud" services actually have a business model that centres around (ab)using the data, not charging for the services they provide.