News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Interview with Terence Tao by krat0sprakhar on Monday September 29, 2014 @06:42AM (#8382307)
The funny thing about mathematics is that you don’t work with regular numbers so much. I never see a 37, I see ‘n’ –a lot of what I do involves a big number n that goes to infinity. Never any specific number.

An interesting answer to probably the most common question that mathematicians are asked. Radiolab[0] covered this and the significance of "favorite/lucky numbers" in a podcast a couple of months back.

[0] - http://www.radiolab.org/story/love-numbers/

Re:Interview with Terence Tao by tel on Monday September 29, 2014 @09:55AM (#8382848)
There's a fascinating story with respect to this.

Alexandre Grothendieck is a famous mathematician known for his incredibly abstract methodologies. He once compared his technique to mathematics to the norm by relating standard mathematical methods as using a sledgehammer to open a nut. To him, his method was to slowly raise the water level and soak the nut until its shell becomes soft and he can open it with just a little pressure from his hand.

However, his highly abstract nature got him in trouble at least once.

One time in discussion a colleague of Grothendieck asked him to consider the argument for a concrete example of prime number. "You mean an actual number?" replied Grothendieck. "Alright, well then take 57".

And now 57 is known as the Grothendieck Prime.

Re:Interview with Terence Tao by arketyp on Monday September 29, 2014 @08:23AM (#8382562)
Asking a mathematician for their favorite constant is like asking a painter what their favorite color is. I like Tao's diplomatic answer.
Re:Interview with Terence Tao by wolfgke on Monday September 29, 2014 @03:24PM (#8384692)
I'd rather say something like "Fischer–Griess monster" (it is a constant in the set of finite simple groups). Surely a constant, but not a numerical one. The interviewer will probably change the topic immediately for not becoming embarrassed. ;-)

Surely a less diplomatic way than Tao's, admitted.