The full NeXTStep documentation, including DPS, AppKit, system administration, NetInfo, etc was about a quarter of that.
Again, the previous was just the windowing system, so at most around 1/10th of the scope of the NeXTSTep documentation, and no, the NeXTSTep docs weren't any less thorough or complete.
So, if you've learned and maybe become an expert in the stuff that requires 3 feet of documentation, you're probably not too thrilled about finding out it's been for naught.
I understand the point you are trying to make, but the truth is an expert would find a lot of similarity in those systems. Even today iOS development feels comfortable and similar to the work I did on SGIs in 93.
Amazon [1] suggests that there were at least 8 volumes.
[1] http://www.amazon.com/Windows-System-Administrators-Definiti...
I think I still have my books at home somewhere. They were by Digital Press if I recall.
I just had a look, and it seems that this was common (see the highlight): http://books.google.de/books?id=d8tByjvMmIwC&pg=PR37&lpg=PR3...
I know we had a lot of the O'Reilly X books floating around. Nobody ever read them, but we felt weird throwing books away. You're right that they got bundled by vendors--I think HP and Sun eventually bundled stuff too. The bundling decision was probably more about trying to justify insanely high workstation prices than an indictment of the complexity of X.
I couldn't get past that part. I've been a software engineer for over 20 years, I love any technology that makes my job easier and allows me to more easily deliver more functionality with higher quality in my products. I can't understand where this mentality comes from.