News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PostgreSQL Outperforms MongoDB in New Round of Tests by JonnieCache on Saturday September 27, 2014 @05:46AM (#8376581)
Just because its a programming language. It can write to disk, open sockets, etc.

"As of PostgreSQL 7.4, PL/Python is only available as an "untrusted" language, meaning it does not offer any way of restricting what users can do in it. It has therefore been renamed to plpythonu. The trusted variant plpython might become available again in future, if a new secure execution mechanism is developed in Python. The writer of a function in untrusted PL/Python must take care that the function cannot be used to do anything unwanted, since it will be able to do anything that could be done by a user logged in as the database administrator. Only superusers can create functions in untrusted languages such as plpythonu."

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpython.html

Incidentally I've been merging my json in perl. It's automatically built into postgres, and the Hash::Merge library with it's configurable behaviour is very handy. Still, looking forward to not doing that. 9.4 is coming before xmas, right?

Re:PostgreSQL Outperforms MongoDB in New Round of Tests by yangyang on Saturday September 27, 2014 @06:46AM (#8376666)
That's not strictly true; PL/Perl is (obviously) a programming language and is available in trusted (with certain operations disabled) and untrusted variants: see [1].

The issue with PL/Python is that it's nigh on impossible to properly sandbox Python.

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/plperl-trusted.htm...