News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by bane on Friday September 26, 2014 @10:06PM (#8375807)
Wow. glad to know my Note 3, as big as it is, is class leading in this particular test. It's definitely a top-notch piece of hardware in every other way.

From specs to hardware build the iPhone 6 just seems really behind the curve and very "blah".

The iPhone 5 was definitely a class leading phone in the hand before this test, feeling like a beautiful instrument. This test is proving it too is a fantastically put together device from a durability POV.

The 6 is very ho hum and I'm adding this to my list of ho hum things about it. It's not a bad phone, but not a great, class leading one in any way either.

I never really thought I'd see the day that a Korean phone designed by a completely anonymous corporate industrial design drone really beat the socks off of Apple's offering, and yet it appears to have happened this year.

All that being said, #bendgate is seriously overblown, just like antenna-gate. This is most likely a desire to hit Apple where it hurts the most, image, in order to extract free stuff/lower price/whatever like what happened last time with antenna-gate.

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by GuiA on Friday September 26, 2014 @10:14PM (#8375825)
> From specs to hardware build the iPhone 6 just seems really behind the curve

Obviously people see what they want to see, but: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8559/iphone-6-and-iphone-6-plu...

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by bane on Friday September 26, 2014 @10:38PM (#8375890)
Specwise it looks like a top-end phone from last year. RAM, screen, etc.

I'm glad to see it's doing well in the javascript benchmarks at least. Speaks highly of Apple's nitro engine.

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by Geee on Saturday September 27, 2014 @01:18AM (#8376153)
No, iPhone's A8 is optimized for single-core performance, which is way more meaningful in real applications than combined multi-core performance. 99% of apps run on single core. Although, A8's combined multi-core performance is also on par with other high-end smartphones.

See comparison to SGS5 in Geekbench 3: http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/wp-content/phoneimages/iPhone-...

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by potatolicious on Saturday September 27, 2014 @01:53AM (#8376204)
> "99% of apps run on single core."

This really isn't true. A rudimentary "Hello World" app, maybe, but all of the common apps that are being run are heavily multithreaded.

Even an app that just uses stock/fairly common libs (like AFNetworking) is going to be multithreaded by virtue of those things alone.

Multi-core performance is critical in the iOS ecosystem, single-core is hardly a concern anymore.

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by kec on Saturday September 27, 2014 @10:42AM (#8377130)
Just because an app is multithreaded doesn't mean it's going to scale to use more than one core on average. It doesn't matter if you can do networking in a background thread if your UI is just going to block until the results come in.
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by manmal on Saturday September 27, 2014 @02:47AM (#8376295)
I think the GP's implication is that the A8 can deal we'll with apps that primarily work on the main/UI thread - which most apps do.
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by GuiA on Friday September 26, 2014 @10:48PM (#8375906)
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by bane on Friday September 26, 2014 @11:38PM (#8375989)
For fun compare to a similar sized phone that's come out at the same time as the iPhone 6.

http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note4_ShootOut_1.htm

Based on our extensive Lab tests and measurements, the Galaxy Note 4 is the Best performing Smartphone display that we have ever tested. It matches or breaks new records in Smartphone display performance for: Highest Absolute Color Accuracy, Highest Screen Resolution, Infinite Contrast Ratio, Highest Peak Brightness, Highest Contrast Rating in Ambient Light, and the smallest Brightness Variation with Viewing Angle. Its Color Management capability provides multiple Color Gamuts – a major advantage that is not currently provided by any of the other leading Smartphones. The Galaxy Note 4 delivers uniformly consistent all around Top Tier display performance: it is the first Smartphone display to ever get all Green (Very Good to Excellent) Ratings in all test and measurement categories (except one Yellow for a Brightness Variation with Average Picture Level) since we started the Display Technology Shoot-Out article Series in 2006, an impressive achievement for a display. The Galaxy Note 4 has again raised the bar for top display performance up by another notch.

It's not like the iPhone 6 is a bad phone. If it were an Android device it would be considered an above average to a good in the field. But it's not, it's an iPhone and expectations are that it should come out as class leading. Which it isn't along most measures to date.

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by Steko on Saturday September 27, 2014 @01:00AM (#8376124)
You haven't shown that it isn't class leading. You've only shown that one phone beats it in one category and not by a lot, two categories if we count pounds to deform.

The Anandtech link above shows the new iPhones basically among the leaders in every category. The displaymate reviews extend that. How you spin that into merly above average and last years quality is beyond me.

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by LnxPrgr3 on Saturday September 27, 2014 @12:37AM (#8376092)
What is infinite contrast ratio? Is the phone able to emit zero light from a pixel instructed to show RGB(0,0,0) when another area asks for RGB(255,255,255)?

Multiple color gamuts—does the phone's screen actually extend well past sRGB, or did they just discover perceptual color mapping?

The compact camera market went through a spec-obsessive phase, and it resulted in 14+ megapixel compact cameras that struggled with anything less than direct sunlight. My 12 megapixel dSLR sounds weaker spec-wise, but works better in every lighting situation—even this aging piece of kit gives me pleasing images at ISO 5,000, well past its design limits.

There's a lot more to design than stuffing in faster CPUs, more RAM, and more screen and camera pixels.

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by gress on Saturday September 27, 2014 @01:01AM (#8376126)
Choosing a different android device to trump each separate specification of the iPhone just proves that there is no single android device that is as good overall.
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by YooLi on Saturday September 27, 2014 @05:31AM (#8376550)
Did you read the iPhone 6 link? It was done after the Note 4, as mentioned in the write-up. Also mentioned in the write-up was

"Based on our extensive Lab tests and measurements, the iPhone 6 Plus is the Best performing Smartphone LCD display that we have ever tested."

Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by bane on Sunday September 28, 2014 @02:23AM (#8379098)
Read the two articles again. In several categories the Note 4 comes out ahead, sometimes significantly.
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by oldmanjay on Saturday September 27, 2014 @12:24AM (#8376076)
I have a hard time trusting prose with inappropriate capitalization
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by slaven on Saturday September 27, 2014 @12:56AM (#8376114)
Not really, it speaks highly of their SOC.
Re:iPhone 6 and 6 Plus not as bendy as believed by mannkind on Friday September 26, 2014 @10:43PM (#8375900)
Obviously those tests were rigged.