News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by th0ma5 on Thursday September 25, 2014 @04:47PM (#8369656)
The oldest (mostly) continuously running light bulb was made in my home town. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centennial_Light ... It is featured also in a documentary about "planned obsolescence" quite prominently.

I think it is well known that things that are made well and do cost a little more are available. This reminds me of a guy who shows how to counterfeit his own product - http://kottke.org/14/01/how-to-make-a-fake-bag

Some things however we've all seem to accept, like light bulbs, razor blades, etc, and its a shame. On one hand, having a newer product that may be better more often is good, and having a lower price for a product that lasts even temporary is also good, but it would be nice if there were more choice, and more awareness, of these kinds of issues in our markets.

Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by Mithaldu on Thursday September 25, 2014 @05:14PM (#8369775)
I wish people would stop posting about that thing. It doesn't even provide enough light to read a book by. If i only ever take microscopical sips from a sealed bottle of water it will also last for years.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by th0ma5 on Thursday September 25, 2014 @05:19PM (#8369791)
Point taken :P What light it does provide is still impressive that it has done it for a hundred years.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by CamperBob2 on Thursday September 25, 2014 @10:59PM (#8371110)
Any bulb will do that if you run it on 1/4 of its rated voltage and never turn it off. It will be about as bright as the "Centennial" bulb.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by roghummal on Friday September 26, 2014 @05:31AM (#8371987)
Any bulb?

I'm biased. I like that they run a webcam: http://www.centennialbulb.org/cam.htm

Where'd you get the 1/4 voltage figure and how does that relate to its longevity?

Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by CamperBob2 on Friday September 26, 2014 @04:46PM (#8374760)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb , under the Light Output and Lifetime subhead.

Lifetime is approximately proportional to the 16th power of the voltage, according to that article. 1/4 was a randomly made up figure (and probably wouldn't even result in a visible glow with many bulbs) but if you could see the light from such a bulb, it would presumably last up to 4 billion times longer than normal. By the same token a 5% reduction in voltage will double the life of the bulb.

So it wouldn't be hard at all to find a voltage somewhere in between that will allow an ordinary incandescent bulb to emit visible, maybe even useful levels of illumination, while lasting 100 years or more.

As others have mentioned, the Centennial bulb doesn't exactly emit useful levels of light. If I'm doing the math right, if you took a 100W/120V incandescent bulb rated for 1000 hours and scaled down the voltage by the 16h root of 876, or 80 volts, its life expectancy would reach 100 years. The bulb would use about half the power be about 1/4 as bright as normal. Its color temperature would obviously be pretty awful, but the Centennial bulb doesn't excel in that department either.

Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by pjc50 on Friday September 26, 2014 @11:43AM (#8373176)
Not quite any bulb. Tungsten filaments evaporate over time, carbon filaments don't. But carbon filaments are much more fragile if subjected to thermal cycling or vibration.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by mark-r on Thursday September 25, 2014 @06:14PM (#8370070)
I once owned a Remington electric razor that just died for no reason one day. I decided to take it apart and see if there was anything obviously wrong with it. There was - the electrical contact with the motor was made by a piece of graphite, and it had worn down to nothing. At that moment I decided to switch to another brand on the hope that it did not practice planned obsolescence, and I've been happy ever since.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by Johnythree on Thursday September 25, 2014 @08:17PM (#8370583)
You've just discovered that Electric motors use brushes on their commutators? Welcome to the 20th century.

Brushes are intended to be replaced, and many manufacturers supply spare brushes in the original packaging.

In the 21st century however the traditional brushes have been replaced by electronic switching.

see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushless_DC_electric_motor

Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by lttlrck on Thursday September 25, 2014 @07:06PM (#8370333)
I wouldn't consider the practice of using graphite brushes in DC motors as planned obsolescence. It's more like best tool for the job, with a limited lifetime by its very nature.