Re:Eric Schmidt to EU: Accept Uber-style Disruption or Face ...
by krapp on Monday September 22, 2014 @06:07PM
(#8352931)
I think part of the game plan of that physical world disruption is not actually giving states a choice in the matter.
It's an interesting sort of revolution action -- to merely will a free market into being and ignore the existence of the state until you become big and rich enough to break its back.
Re:Eric Schmidt to EU: Accept Uber-style Disruption or Face ...
by toomuchtodo on Monday September 22, 2014 @06:16PM
(#8352978)
Is "Just take an Uber" going to be the new "Let them eat cake"?
If the NSA can siphon data between Google datacenters, who is Google going to complain to when a government severs their fiber? They don't appear to be doing so well in China, so clearly it can be done.
Re:Eric Schmidt to EU: Accept Uber-style Disruption or Face ...
by krapp on Monday September 22, 2014 @07:18PM
(#8353230)
I remember when the thread about Uber's problems in Germany appeared, several German posters mentioned that they were perfectly satisfied with the existing, regulated system there.
Uber's argument that regulation = 'innovation stifling economic collapse' doesn't always track, not every market is New York or SF and not everyone is willing to accept at-will employment for slave wages with total personal liability.
Still, I think it will be interesting to see how far Uber is willing to push and how hard states are willing to push back.
Internet-based disruption? Easy. Physical world disruption using public infrastructure and slave wage labor? Not so much.