News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by DigitalSea on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:45PM (#8338090)
I find this incredibly sexist.

To say that girls worker harder than boys offends me greatly. These studies are never accurate and somewhat biased, and I think work ethic is something that can't be averaged out like this. I don't doubt a lot of girls out there do work harder than boys, but making statements like: "Girls succeed over boys in school because they are more apt to plan ahead, set academic goals, and put effort into achieving those goals." is offensive and heavily typecasting all boys into the same category.

There are boys out there who put effort into planning and setting academic goals, because I am friends with many guys like this who care and put the effort in, I also know as many women who do the same. If this study were truth, why are there just as many male academics as there are female? If anything, I have seen more male academics than female (in my experience and field). Imagine if the effort that went into this study was put to better use, to help solve a problem or achieve a result that would benefit society? Studies like this are a waste of time.

I realise this is just a study and the whole point might be to highlight issues with school curriculum and have no sexist undertones, but at the same time, studies like this are relatively useless. The modern school system being completely broken to the point kids are falling behind is a very well known fact, and sadly, no study is going to change that anytime soon.

Maybe if we had less studies and more action on fixing things, then there wouldn't be instances of boys getting left behind in the schooling system. Did it ever occur to those responsible for this study that maybe, just maybe, the system is actually broken? And maybe, just maybe, it has nothing to do with what sex you are? I feel like society already has enough issues when it comes to rampant sexism and gender equality without more fuel being thrown on the fire. All studies like this do is take a handful of people, average and collate the results and then proclaim they've made some kind of conclusive discovery that applies to everyone outside of the sample group. Unless this study leads to change or another longer and more conclusive study, the results mean nothing.

Regardless of what sex you are, nobody should be getting left behind. If it is true that boys learn differently to girls, then adjust the curriculum to make it more flexible for different learning styles. When I went to school I struggled, not because I am stupid or because I am a male, I struggled because the curriculum assumed everyone learns the same way and when I couldn't fit myself within the mould, I got left behind and taught myself everything I needed to know. Everyone learns differently, we are not all the same.

Sorry for getting worked up, Studies like this do nothing to help resolve gender equality gaps whatsoever.

Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by alukima on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:51PM (#8338122)
The entire point of the article is that the way schools grade may discriminate against boys. There are lots of articles about things that may discriminate against women. Society isn't perfect, writing articles that raise awareness is not sexist or discriminatory towards either sex.
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by learnstats2 on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:54PM (#8338126)
It's not sexist to point out a fact: "Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys". This is almost universally true where statistics can be found, internationally and across all subjects. It's factual that girls perform better in school: you can decide what the reason for that is, but there must be a reason. It's the essential purpose of science to try and figure out the reasons - as they have here.

You then ask: Why are there just as many male academics as there are female? I would ask: Why do males fill out almost all highly skilled and/or highly paid fields, despite poorer school results on average.

This is a very important question which points out the true scale and direction of the problem.

Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by calibraxis on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:07PM (#8338169)
Sexism is about power relations. Like racism and capitalism. Men dominate society. Doesn't matter how meritorious women are. Women can be tacitly competent and men buffoonish, yet incompetents routinely triumph.

After all, they're gatekeepers and enforcers.

Since society ridiculously built a massive infrastructure based on gender, women and men are trained differently. To the intellectual destruction of men.

Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by Torgo on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:44PM (#8338302)
In the article, evidence is presented that boys and girls need to be trained differently, and are being trained the same, to boys' detriment. That is the exact opposite of what you're saying.
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by vezzy-fnord on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:18PM (#8338202)
This is true only if you use a specific sociological definition of "sexism", which is absolutely not to be equivocated with the one in common vernacular.
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by dragonwriter on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:38PM (#8338278)
> This is true only if you use a specific sociological definition of "sexism", which is absolutely not to be equivocated with the one in common vernacular.

I think you mean "equate". "Equivocate" means something quite different.

Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by vezzy-fnord on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:46PM (#8338309)
Actually, I do mean "equivocate". To quote Wikipedia, it is "the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning or sense (by glossing over which meaning is intended at a particular time)".
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by dragonwriter on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:56PM (#8338331)
I know what "equivocate" means -- but when you equivocate by conflating one sense of a word with another sense of the word, its not described as equivocating the first sense with the latter sense. You might equivocate with a person (the person to whom you address the equivocation), or equivocate by interchanging one definition with another.
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by graycat on Thursday September 18, 2014 @09:51PM (#8338640)
> If this study were truth, why are there just as many male academics as there are female?

My guess is that the study focused mostly on K-8 or K-12 maybe with some college. In contrast, you are talking about what happens in the world of work. There the boys/men can be plenty serious, hard working, aggressive, bright, ambitious, good at planning, etc.

From all I've seen, for high end technical work, especially research, in STEM fields, the men totally and effortlessly blow away nearly all the women.

In my experience, in grades 1-8, the teachers treated me like dirt. Thank goodness for social promotion! But in math, from grade 9 through high school, college, graduate school, work, to the present, I totally effortlessly blow away nearly every female I've come across. It's like the females are from a different planet. In other ways, the females totally, effortlessly blow me away.

Or, from E. Fromm, "Men and women deserve equal respect as persons but are not the same.". From all I can see, this is true.

Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by gertef on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:52PM (#8338124)
"Academics" are a small biased sample of "K-12" or event college-level students.
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by Fomite on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:00PM (#8338147)
If a sample is biased, it is often interesting to ask "Why?"
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by onewaystreet on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:50PM (#8338117)
Now you know how many women feel every day of their lives.
Re:Girls Get Better Grades Than Boys by gph on Thursday September 18, 2014 @07:06PM (#8338164)
You mean falsely victimizing themselves?