News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by celoyd on Sunday September 20, 2009 @04:43PM (#833515)
My grandmother had to work in factories under the Nazis toward the end of WWII, and anyone doing this sort of thing would have been taken outside and shot.

She says they were told not to work too slow, because that was sabotage, and not too fast, because that was bad for the morale of the others. Her main problems were with the POW workers (slaves), who tried to kill all the Germans they could. Several times, heavy weights were dropped off railings just above her, etc.

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by jacquesm on Monday September 21, 2009 @03:08AM (#834133)
Same with my granddad, he had to work in the Opel factories. Their gig was to make cars that would function when tested, but that would fail within a couple of days of delivery to the field.

So, whenever they could they would structurally weaken some element deep in the engine just enough to make it fail.

This is a lot more difficult than it sounds, it is a study in planned obsolescence, because if you make it fail to soon you get a bullet to the back there is not a lot of room for error.

Finally they settled on making a fairly small cut in the wall of a piston, apparently that was good enough to survive a test or two but would fail quickly enough under actual use.

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by tomjen2 on Monday September 21, 2009 @01:22AM (#834050)
First I am sorry to hear about your grandmother.

Second, how far you take the instructions in the booklet obviously depends on the work you do, and the higher up you are, the easier it is to screw up something without being found out.

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by ngs on Sunday September 20, 2009 @07:13PM (#833688)
You've been voted up for a post that is ambiguous in its asertion. What did your grandmother do? How old was she at the time?
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by celoyd on Sunday September 20, 2009 @08:35PM (#833786)
I'm not sure what's ambiguous. Certainly I'm generalizing ("anyone") from an anecdote; I'm not trying to make a rock-solid historical claim.

I think most of her factory work was making shells. She was born in 1921; this would presumably been in 1943-45 or so.

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by ngs on Monday September 21, 2009 @05:24AM (#834264)
What I meant say was it isn't clear to me if she was a worker or ran the factory.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by celoyd on Monday September 21, 2009 @01:47PM (#835077)
Oh! Just a worker.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by hughprime on Sunday September 20, 2009 @06:38PM (#833650)
If I were the OSS I would have written up this section of the booklet and then leaked it directly to the enemy at all possible levels. What better way to cause chaos among the German bureaucracy than to spread paranoia that anyone engaged in normal bureaucratic dithering, patriotic speechifying or bad handwriting might actually be a saboteur?
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by onreact-com on Monday September 21, 2009 @04:12AM (#834190)
In Nazi Germany everybody, like in other fascists dictatorships, was suspicious anyways.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by varjag on Sunday September 20, 2009 @04:17PM (#833487)
Wow, so Dilbert is really about CIA conspiracy!
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by ngs on Sunday September 20, 2009 @05:18PM (#833577)
If you want to read something interesting regarding sponsored subversion, I recommend 'Legacy of Ashes' by Tim Weiner. Fantastic hacks and incredible, yet true and widely uncredited events in US and world history executed by the OSS and CIA.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by adatta02 on Sunday September 20, 2009 @04:17PM (#833489)
(12) General Devices for Lowering Morale and Creating Confusion

(e) Act stupid.

-clearly why we won the war

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by jacquesm on Monday September 21, 2009 @03:12AM (#834136)
Which one and who is we ?
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by Erf on Sunday September 20, 2009 @08:27PM (#833778)
This, incidentally, reads like a business how-not-to.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by joe_the_user on Sunday September 20, 2009 @10:23PM (#833888)
But also like a "how it is really done..."
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by uuilly on Monday September 21, 2009 @12:53AM (#834028)
Clearly you have never worked for a big company :)
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by jhancock on Monday September 21, 2009 @03:13AM (#834138)
To me it reads like the current operating guide for just about every politician I've ever met ;)
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by d_c on Sunday September 20, 2009 @04:38PM (#833508)
Could be partly the little bureaucrats guide to heaven.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by abalashov on Monday September 21, 2009 @04:40AM (#834227)
Insist on doing everything through "channels." Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to, expedite decisions.

Ahahaha.

Post-war and enduringly postmillenial corporate America, anyone?

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by shin_lao on Monday September 21, 2009 @09:39AM (#834544)
At first I thought this was the training manual of French Administration personal...
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by dustingetz on Sunday September 20, 2009 @04:12PM (#833481)
is this for real?
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by joe_bleau on Sunday September 20, 2009 @04:51PM (#833530)
The PDF certainly seems authentic to me. The language and technology seems correct for the period. I was surprised that some of the units were mixed standard/metric, such as "75-100 grams for each 10 gallons of gasoline".
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by laut on Sunday September 20, 2009 @08:44PM (#833795)
You meant mix of standard and imperial units? :)
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by javery on Sunday September 20, 2009 @10:15PM (#833878)
I think this is the playbook that the GOP in congress is playing by.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by tlrobinson on Monday September 21, 2009 @03:16AM (#834139)
It's comical how much this sounds like some peoples' workplaces.
Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by moeffju on Monday September 21, 2009 @06:11AM (#834296)
a.k.a "Politics & Economics - The Missing Manual"

I'll be keeping this as a HOW-NOT-TO reference.

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by DXL on Sunday September 20, 2009 @04:42PM (#833514)
For people like me, who get a Firefox security error message, try the links without the s in https:

http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/CAcert_Inc/Board/oss/oss_sabota...

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by joe_the_user on Monday September 21, 2009 @01:21AM (#834049)
Lol...

39a) All web necessary pages must established on secure servers with custom certs not recognized by any browser...

Re:OSS (pre-CIA) Simple Sabotage Field Manual by onreact-com on Monday September 21, 2009 @04:10AM (#834187)
"svn.cacert.org uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted."