Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by lepht on Friday September 12, 2014 @10:38AM
(#8308232)
That was my initial thought/worry as well, but it looks like Lift.app is safe from Google acquistruction for now: 'Lift Labs'[0] is the creator of a spoon that helps parkinson's victims eat, and the bottom of the Lift.app website[1] gives the company name 'Lift Worldwide',
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by tonystubblebine on Friday September 12, 2014 @12:15PM
(#8308832)
I'm so glad this worried you! I'm the @liftapp founder. When we started there were no startups named Lift. Now the world is rich with L(i/y)fts. It's insane. Things look good for us (as in we have runway and revenue), so I don't think you'll be seeing any acquisition news from us.
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by jwr on Friday September 12, 2014 @06:50AM
(#8307400)
Lately, as I hear of extremely-cool startups being acquired by Google, I feel rather sad. I would much rather see them succeed on their own, than disappear into the belly of Google. And I really can't see how Google, which is an advertising company, can bring value to this acquisition.
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by robg on Friday September 12, 2014 @10:46PM
(#8311492)
They are already selling. This acquisition won't affect that. It will help them get more publicity with more resources and more expertise. The numbers will be going up, not down.
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by yanma on Saturday September 13, 2014 @08:24PM
(#8314148)
That seems to be the state currently, but you just never know. BufferBox, a YC alum, was bought out and subsequently dissolved within a couple of years despite their momentum before being acquired.
That being said, Google X operates very differently from rest of of Googleverse.
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by magicalist on Friday September 12, 2014 @11:55AM
(#8308724)
The problem with taking vague rhetorical stances like that instead of actually stating how you think it's gotten "significantly worse" is I have no idea what aspect you're talking about, so it's difficult to empathize and try to imagine the downside you're seeing.
I'll go out on a limb and say no, not at all, especially with the qualifier "significantly" on there, which I would take to mean that even the casual Waze fan (like me) should have noticed what's going wrong there.
I don't particularly care about some of the new features like sharing location with friends, but I just don't use them (and they seem plausibly like things they would have added anyway, with or without acquisition).
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by lnanek2 on Friday September 12, 2014 @10:57AM
(#8308328)
Yes, but have they ever managed to do anything good in the space? Google Health crashed and burned remember. Lift Labs could have found a better company to work with just by going to single Standford medicine and tech event, of which there are dozens...
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by robg on Friday September 12, 2014 @12:52PM
(#8309032)
100% chance of success vs. something much lower than that. Building hardware is hard enough. Jumping through the medical regulations is something else.
Re:Lift Labs joins Google X
by BorisMelnik on Friday September 12, 2014 @01:55AM
(#8306751)
I am so happy to hear about this, and about Lift in general. I've had a number of loved ones effected by this and seeing products that make life even a little bit easier is just really cool.
Congratulations to Anupam and team!
[0]: http://www.liftlabsdesign.com/ [1]: https://www.lift.do/
FWIW, here's the email where we decided on the name and specifically went looking for other people using it: http://www.quora.com/Lift-app/How-did-Lift-app-get-its-name
Sure, they can do research on cool stuff. But do you see Google selling and distributing these utensils anytime soon?
In other words, will this acquisition put more useful devices in the hands of those who badly need them?
I don't think so.
That being said, Google X operates very differently from rest of of Googleverse.
I'll go out on a limb and say no, not at all, especially with the qualifier "significantly" on there, which I would take to mean that even the casual Waze fan (like me) should have noticed what's going wrong there.
I don't particularly care about some of the new features like sharing location with friends, but I just don't use them (and they seem plausibly like things they would have added anyway, with or without acquisition).