Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by johnward on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @04:02PM
(#8259794)
A WSJ article that is pay walled and has no comments is on the HN second page, approaching HN front page. Something is wrong with this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by cardiffspaceman on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @12:25AM
(#8261502)
What specifically is wrong? Are there too many paying WSJ supscribers on HN?
Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by johnward on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @10:09AM
(#8263036)
It really destroys the UX of HN. Support the WSJ if you would like and browse the articles on that site. Don't submit them to a site where one expects to be able to read the article that is linked to. In this case the valleywag blog spam summary of this article is more useful because I can actually read it.
Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by clintcparker on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @04:22PM
(#8259924)
Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by johnward on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @10:21AM
(#8263100)
Thanks. Doesn't appear to work anymore. Googling the URL still works but it's a pain.
Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by DanBC on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @12:26AM
(#8261508)
WSJ allows a certain number of free reads per month.
Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by johnward on Wednesday September 03, 2014 @10:13AM
(#8263054)
It was the second day of the month. The first time I have been to WSJ this month.
Re:Silicon Valley Cafeterias Whet Appetite of IRS
by com2kid on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @04:25PM
(#8259936)
Why is it a problem? The WSJ has high quality reporting. If the content is worth reading, then support the creators.