Re:Show HN: RandomStartup.org – Refresh the page to discover...
by dublinben on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @03:43PM
(#8259675)
I think a reasonable point at which to consider startups just normal companies is upon IPO or acquisition. That's certainly the end goal for most startups, and when the structure really changes.
Re:Show HN: RandomStartup.org – Refresh the page to discover...
by duaneb on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @08:51PM
(#8261011)
...unless they don't IPO, or they aren't acquired. Hopefully there are less grim options for startups to be validated.
Re:Show HN: RandomStartup.org – Refresh the page to discover...
by smsm42 on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @05:01PM
(#8260129)
I think IPO or acquisition is to narrow criteria. Not all companies go public. You won't call behemoths like Koch Industries, Ernst & Young, Dell or Heinz startups, yet they are not public.
Re:Show HN: RandomStartup.org – Refresh the page to discover...
by larrys on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @03:09PM
(#8259486)
"When is a startup no longer a startup?"
There is really no dejure definition of a startup as it is. Not to mention that the site doesn't even give its own definition of what qualifies to be listed on the site.
Re:Show HN: RandomStartup.org – Refresh the page to discover...
by lokeshk on Tuesday September 02, 2014 @02:55PM
(#8259417)
+1. I wonder if making the work of curating the list of startups driven by a community, like in Wikipedia, would be more beneficial? It would also work better if start-ups are defined as part of the guideline.
Should mint.com (acquired by Intuit five years ago after raising thirty million in five rounds) or redfin.com (ten years old, and has raised a hundred million dollars in seven rounds) really be considered startups?