Re:Hackers Build a Skype That’s Not Controlled by Microsoft
by etiam on Monday September 01, 2014 @03:42PM
(#8254388)
Very little configuration required seems to be one main idea.
The most important reason I have been interested in Tox is that I got the impression early on that they intend to make it resistant to traffic analysis as well (and judging from this thread
http://4chanarchive.net/threads/g/Tox-Thread/43340618
there are still such plans) but that isn't emphasized in the page at tox.im any more.
I'm guessing they're prioritizing getting something that the average Skype user would be capable of installing and configuring, and saving the onion routing feature for later.
Re:Hackers Build a Skype That’s Not Controlled by Microsoft
by tracker1 on Monday September 01, 2014 @08:29PM
(#8255206)
I do think that a directory service for search/lookup may be desired as well... where people can upload their device key(s) and bind to say their email address or other handle for search/discovery.
Re:Hackers Build a Skype That’s Not Controlled by Microsoft
by davexunit on Monday September 01, 2014 @09:00PM
(#8255283)
Tox is peer-to-peer, whereas XMPP requires (de)centralized servers. Tox is encrypted always, XMPP is unencrypted by default and OTR is hard to use. The Tox API, as alpha as it is, is pretty easy to work with, too. I wrote mostly complete Guile bindings for libtoxcore and a basic Tox bot in about a week.
Re:Hackers Build a Skype That’s Not Controlled by Microsoft
by jeena on Monday September 01, 2014 @02:15PM
(#8254067)
You don't need to run a server.
It's easy to stand out when comparing to the worst alternative out there.