Re:Experimental Ebola drug cured 100% of monkeys tested
by cocolos on Saturday August 30, 2014 @09:06PM
(#8248095)
Last I checked I thought we were more closely related to primates not monkeys--not sure if that's of any significance.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Experimental Ebola drug cured 100% of monkeys tested
by tejon on Saturday August 30, 2014 @09:13PM
(#8248107)
Monkeys are primates.
Oh, let's see if I can remember the main groupings...
Primates ->
> Lower Primates ->
> > Tarsiers
> > Aye-Ayes
> > Lorises
> Lemurs & Red Pandas
> Simians ->
> > New World Monkeys
> > Old World Monkeys
> Hominoids ->
> > Gibbons & Siamangs
> > Great Apes ->
> > > Orangutans
> > > Gorillas
> > > Chimpanzees ->
> > > > Chimpanzee
> > > > Bonobo
> > > > Humans
Re:Experimental Ebola drug cured 100% of monkeys tested
by Crito on Saturday August 30, 2014 @10:03PM
(#8248209)
Wiki has humans and chimpanzees/bonobos in different subtribes, so humans wouldn't be under "Chimpanzees ->":
Tribe Hominini
Subtribe Panina
Genus Pan
Chimpanzee (common chimpanzee), Pan troglodytes
Central chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes troglodytes
Western chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes verus
Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes ellioti
Eastern chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii
Bonobo (pygmy chimpanzee), Pan paniscus
Subtribe Hominina
Genus Homo
Human, Homo sapiens
Anatomically modern human, Homo sapiens sapiens
Re:Experimental Ebola drug cured 100% of monkeys tested
by tejon on Saturday August 30, 2014 @10:54PM
(#8248312)
Yeah, it's not the mainstream classification but it's been proposed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Chimpanzee) and I find it entertaining. So. ;)
Re:Experimental Ebola drug cured 100% of monkeys tested
by lotsofmangos on Sunday August 31, 2014 @07:22AM
(#8249039)
I particularly like Pans Narrans as a classification.
Though I suspect that Pans Superbia might be unfortunately closer to the mark.