Re:PACER Deleting Old Cases; Time to Fix PACER
by DannyBee on Thursday August 28, 2014 @03:31PM
(#8239215)
Except, of course, that PACER has various requirements that conflict with this, and they make as hard as possible to keep this profit (which was 150 million in 2008) up.
For example written opinions that "set forth a reasoned explanation for a court's decision" must be free of charge.
They make it is as difficult as possible to access this, and do not allow any sort of bulk download, because doing so would make PACER/courtweb less useful as a pay service.
For example written opinions that "set forth a reasoned explanation for a court's decision" must be free of charge.
They make it is as difficult as possible to access this, and do not allow any sort of bulk download, because doing so would make PACER/courtweb less useful as a pay service.