Or at least a rule against paywalled links with only 113 words, and nothing more than a passing summary of the original story broken by another organization: https://www.theinformation.com/Amazon-Nears-Deal-to-Acquire-...

The WSJ's article isn't a summary of The Information's original story. They confirmed the report based on their own sources, which is completely legitimate even if they weren't the first ones to break the story.

But what if it is news broken by WSJ proprietary investigation? Should there really be a rule on HN that dampens original reporting?

The site is called Hacker News, not Hacker Support broken business models that keep content off the open web but get traffic by faking it.

For the majority of readers here there is no news at the end of that link, just and advert for the WSJ's paywalled services. It's effectively spam for most of us.

It's not helpful, even if they break it first, if you cannot read the actual article.

The title alerted you to the news, you can search for coverage on other outlets after it breaks.

The submitter can find another outlet and submit that. Submitting a paywall article is like submitting an item with no link at all, with text content "google it."

> you can search

The whole point of this site is so I don't have to search, I just have to come here.

I agree, this is annoying.

This Google search link should do the trick.

Edit: this is only somewhat reliable...YMMV.

https://www.google.com/#q=site%3Awsj.com+%22Amazon+to+Buy+Vi...

A simple way to get around this for the WSJ is to search the title on Google News. Click through and you just jumped the paywall.

This actually isn't reliable. It doesn't work for me, for instance.