News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by whirlycott1 on Sunday September 13, 2009 @07:39PM (#820759)
The programmability of a shell just isn't interesting to me. Whenever I start hacking a shell script, it either starts out as just two or three lines or it evolves to the point where I feel like I need a "real" language. At that point, I'll end up hacking it in perl or python.

In the meantime, I'm happy enough with bash.

Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by weavejester on Sunday September 13, 2009 @09:15PM (#820888)
I find that Fish is better for interactive use. It has as-you-type syntax highlighting and indentation, and the tab completion tends to be better.
Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by jimbokun on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:02PM (#820786)
I would like to see the interactive Read Eval Print Loops of one of these languages finish closing the gap and become good shell replacements. I find I can get close to that sometimes with interactive programming environments, but not quite.
Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by jdp on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:53PM (#820852)
There's rush: "rush is a replacement for the unix shell (bash, zsh, etc) which uses pure Ruby syntax" from http://rush.heroku.com

I haven't used it though, I actually switched from bash to fish about 6 months ago

Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by maelstrom on Sunday September 13, 2009 @10:27PM (#820972)
Have you tried ipython? http://ipython.scipy.org/moin/ Pretty close...
Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by cturner on Monday September 14, 2009 @03:08AM (#821251)
I've been thinking about this also and was planning this week to change one of my login shells to just pythn to trial it. I've now got two small line-based editors running in python (one is an ed clone, the other is simpler and uses list comprehension), and it's simple enough to write wrapper functions around the bits you need to change directory and spawn process. There's no standardisation of effort, but it's completely doable just on your own system. I realise it's probably not at the top of your mind, but can you think what you found missing when you last tried it?
Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by gjm11 on Sunday September 13, 2009 @08:06PM (#820788)
Well, there's scsh (http://www.scsh.net/), but it's not under active development any more.
Re:Fish - The friendly interactive shell by stuntmouse on Monday September 14, 2009 @03:05AM (#821246)
Which is a shame.

I just found shelisp [1] which, despite the questionable name, looks simple and promising.

[1] http://dan.corlan.net/shelisp/