I suppose that's why I consider Fahrenheit to be a very appropriate scale - since it centers nicely on the range of temperatures one might actually experience on Earth, naively assuming that America is representative of the rest of the planet - and isn't quite so arbitrary as one indexed to the temperature of boiling water, a phenomenon which a person in America - and, presumptuously, the rest of the Earth - isn't likely to encounter without having intentionally induced it.
But perhaps -15 and 40 really are more sensible positions for roughly opposite extremes, and we really are the odd ones for using 0 and 100.
Then you have 100F which is supposed to be the normal body temperature, but actually it means having fever.
There is only one case you might wish to use a tenth of Celsius in every day life and that's reporting body temperature around 37C-39C.
Like I've said, scaling is weird, it doesn't make much sense when firstly introduced. I have a friend who graduated MIT (PhD in aerospace engineering), living in the US for over 10 years and he is comfortable doing calculations and every day estimations in imperial units, except for temperature.
There's easily enough precision in the Celsius scale for everyday measurements, so it all comes down to what you're used to.