Re:Ask HN: Review ContextSense - deduces context and sentime...
by elcron on Thursday September 10, 2009 @05:23PM
(#816230)
Cool! I tried something like this, it classified blog posts into 100 different moods... it had ~8% accuracy (It also classified as positive or negative, but I don't remember the accuracy, I'll have to dig it up at some point...). Good luck with it.
Re:Ask HN: Review ContextSense - deduces context and sentime...
by paraschopra on Friday September 11, 2009 @12:16AM
(#816835)
Do you remember what was it? I will be really curious to have a look. Thanks.
Re:Ask HN: Review ContextSense - deduces context and sentime...
by elcron on Friday September 11, 2009 @02:56PM
(#817871)
It was accurate around 56% of the time classifying as positive, negative, or neutral. I used a naive Bayesian classifier and guessed the highest rather than showing the percent positive.
ContextSense was made to demonstrate our contextual targeting capabilities -- and sentiment aspect was added to avoid traditional blunders of displaying ads on pages/news on catastrophies. Best to try ContextSense with text heavy URLs. Also try it with news items (both positive and negative).
I will be happy to provide API access in case any of you is interested in trying it out.