News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Happy Demise of the 10X Engineer by nsxwolf on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @12:48PM (#8109327)
It seems this claim has been made forever. COBOL was supposed to make programmers unnecessary. So were rules engines. And code generators and an endless list of other technologies.
Re:The Happy Demise of the 10X Engineer by jjoonathan on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @12:54PM (#8109382)
I agree that Gerstenzang is premature. But it'll happen eventually. If it doesn't happen by making programming easy it will happen by flooding the industry with enough competent programmers to have the same effect (depressed wages, high unemployment, etc). See: non-software engineering occupations (excepting doctors, who have managed to turn the risks inherent in their profession into a legally mandated union).
Re:The Happy Demise of the 10X Engineer by kabdib on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @12:58PM (#8109405)
Human-equivalent AI has always been 30 years out . . . 20 years if you don't know the field. :-)
Re:The Happy Demise of the 10X Engineer by menzoic on Wednesday July 30, 2014 @01:19PM (#8109599)
Demand for engineers is increasing much more rapidly than non-software engineering occupations. Soon every company will need an software engineer of some sort.