Wait, is it a real question or sarcasm? You seem to switch back and forth.

> Does he or does he not support the GLBT community. It was of such consequence to Brendan Eich that he was let go.

I don't think that's an accurate description. Eich's past public participation in a particular attack on equal rights targetting that community triggered a public controversy including publicized boycotts of Mozilla, but I don't think that there is any basis for concluding that he was let go because of his stance on LGBT issues rather than his perceived inability and/or unwillingness as CEO to manage a PR issue that was affecting Mozilla. (And even that may just have been the straw that broke the camel's back -- as I recall, there were reports that he was a controversial choice with split support on the board from the outset for reasons unrelated to the LGBT issue.)

> So it must be that Chris Beard does support this community.

Or that the actual issue around Eich is more complex than the what you are trying to simplify it to.

More complex? So if Chris Beard donated to Focus on the Family (hypothetically) he would be just fine at Mozilla?

Come on, Brendan Eich would still be CEO if he didn't make that one political donation and came out supporting the community.

You need to re-read dragonwriter's comment, because that is not the reason that dragonwriter is suggesting at all.

I think we all know how that would play out.

Eich quit, he wasn't let go.

> Because we all know that having no opinion on this matter cannot stand.

Eich didn't have "no opinion", and didn't just have "an opinion", he had acted specifically to enshrine inequality in CA's constitution.

2. Would I prefer bigoted assholes not try to force their vindictive bigotry unto others? Are you really asking that?

2. Begs the question: do you consider that everyone who doesn't support gay marriage is bigoted? Also: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity