Re:Why blurring sensitive information is a bad idea (2007)
by robin_reala on Thursday July 24, 2014 @08:33AM
(#8079232)
Do they? First I’ve heard of that…
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why blurring sensitive information is a bad idea (2007)
by akadruid1 on Thursday July 24, 2014 @08:46AM
(#8079293)
The thumbnail is part of the EXIF metadata. It's reasonably well-known now, but it was not always the case... http://graphicssoft.about.com/b/2003/07/26/techtvs-cat-schwa...
Re:Why blurring sensitive information is a bad idea (2007)
by robin_reala on Thursday July 24, 2014 @12:48PM
(#8080649)
Huh, interesting. Thanks!
Re:Why blurring sensitive information is a bad idea (2007)
by philjohn on Thursday July 24, 2014 @09:13AM
(#8079409)
A few years ago a TV presenter got caught out by this, she posted a cropped photo of herself online, but the original, uncropped version could be recovered from the file which showed her topless.
Re:Why blurring sensitive information is a bad idea (2007)
by bluedino on Thursday July 24, 2014 @10:23AM
(#8079690)
There was a trend for a while of people posting images to imgur that had a totally different thumbnail. A rickroll of sorts.
Re:Why blurring sensitive information is a bad idea (2007)
by Natsu on Friday July 25, 2014 @02:28AM
(#8083991)
I believe it's a Photoshop thing, rather than something common to all images. Photoshop in general does unusual things.
See also: http://u88.n24.queensu.ca/exiftool/forum/index.php?topic=451...
Re:Why blurring sensitive information is a bad idea (2007)
by dheera on Friday July 25, 2014 @01:46AM
(#8083926)
You can use 'exiftool' on Linux to manipulate the EXIF data, get rid of the thumbnail, or set it to whatever you want. Imagemagick's 'convert' command also has a '-strip' option that will get rid of all EXIF data including any thumbnails.