News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by icebraining on Monday July 21, 2014 @12:13PM (#8064357)
Agreed. By the same token, we should also fix by the decree the price of any service - after all, companies can put surcharges and other tricks after you signed up. I say the Legislature of California should decide how much is fair for a SaaS company in SF to charge for its apps. Clearly they know better than the consumer. And it should be a standard price, none of this nonsense of different companies charging different prices.
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by fred_durst on Monday July 21, 2014 @12:31PM (#8064465)
Why do we need stop lights? I've never been hit by a car, why should the government decide when I cross the street. A car stopping and my crossing is a contract between me and the stopping driver. The government will never be able to decide when is the best time for cars to stop and people to cross.
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by icebraining on Tuesday July 22, 2014 @04:05AM (#8067821)
Maybe we don't: "“Naked Streets” Without Traffic Lights Improve Flow and Safety"

An article in a local Bristol newspaper explaining the effort stated, “drivers will now be expected to use a combination of common sense and courtesy to negotiate the junction of the town’s High Street, Wyndam Way and The Cabstand.”

http://thecityfix.com/blog/naked-streets-without-traffic-lig...

"Removing Roads and Traffic Lights Speeds Urban Travel"

Another kind of anarchy could actually speed travel as well—namely, a counterintuitive traffic design strategy known as shared streets. The practice encourages driver anarchy by removing traffic lights, street markings, and boundaries between the street and sidewalk. Studies conducted in northern Europe, where shared streets are common, point to improved safety and traffic flow.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/removing-roads-and...

Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by techpeace on Monday July 21, 2014 @12:30PM (#8064461)
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by icebraining on Monday July 21, 2014 @12:32PM (#8064478)
It'd be more helpful if you explained in what way is it a strawman.
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by kalleboo on Monday July 21, 2014 @01:58PM (#8064963)
Nobody said the exact pricing of Uber should be regulated.
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by icebraining on Tuesday July 22, 2014 @03:53AM (#8067792)
That's what applying taxi regulations does.
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by kalleboo on Tuesday July 22, 2014 @09:38AM (#8068883)
It does? Why? I've never heard of that. Where I'm from, taxi regulations are basically a more stringent driver's license, insurance, inspected taxi meter, and standardized/consumer-friendly presentation of the pricing. If a taxi wants to charge $100/km then that's up to them, but it has to be clearly displayed in the taxi window so the customer can avoid them.
Re:Seoul Moves to Ban Uber, Plans Own App by icebraining on Tuesday July 22, 2014 @11:15AM (#8069392)
As far as I know, most cities regulate fares. Seoul (the city in the article) certainly does, as according to a survey done by some economists, so do most cities in the US. Same here in Lisbon.