Re:Camels and humps: a retraction [pdf]
by hyperpape on Sunday July 20, 2014 @05:38PM
(#8061599)
The whole "our statisticians didn't find my claims supported by the evidence" didn't seem relevant?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Camels and humps: a retraction [pdf]
by QuantumChaos on Sunday July 20, 2014 @07:33PM
(#8061908)
where does he say that specifically? He refers to statisticians helping to do further analysis on the data, but I don't see where they showed that the main claim (that the test is predictive of success in the course) is refuted by statisticians.