News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proposed New York State Virtual Currency Regulations [pdf] by tonyhb on Thursday July 17, 2014 @08:39PM (#8051095)
It's not that our current system functions well:

- ACH/normal bank transfers take days

- Files and money transfers are handled via SFTP

- There's no checks in place to see if the account transferring the money actually has enough funds. The money is moved and rolled back once the bank finds out

- It's legitimately difficult to move or accept non-cash payments through a bank (without Stripe/Braintree etc.)

- Checks are still valid

- Banks charge for incoming transfers (I don't understand this still)

It's more like it has had to do well; it's all we have had. Compared to Europe, it's really not great.

There is a much better alternative out there now. And it's tenable.

Re:Proposed New York State Virtual Currency Regulations [pdf] by wdewind on Thursday July 17, 2014 @10:16PM (#8051337)
Yep, I think that's totally fair. European banking infrastructure is definitely superior. I work in payments, believe me I know about the short comings of the ACH system :)

A lot of my main comment was more about how the Fed/Govt handled/handles the fiat currency of the US and the bailout. On those fronts I think we are doing significantly better than the Euro and Europe's response to the financial crisis.

Re:Proposed New York State Virtual Currency Regulations [pdf] by tonyhb on Thursday July 17, 2014 @10:53PM (#8051447)
Ah totally, completely agree with you there. Europe haven't had the greatest time with austerity.