News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Loop Recognition Benchmarks in C++, Java, Go, Scala (2011) [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:Loop Recognition Benchmarks in C++, Java, Go, Scala (2011... by dang on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @07:41PM (#8045236)
Yes, and the title was rewritten as well [1].

Submitters: please use an article's title unless it is linkbait or misleading [2].

1. Submitted title was "Google Publishes C++, Go, Java and Scala Performance Benchmarks"

2. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Loop Recognition Benchmarks in C++, Java, Go, Scala (2011... by barrkel on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @08:40PM (#8045407)
IMO the title is misleading, and the submitted title is better. Though "Google Researcher Publishes..." would more accurately state its provenance.

The algorithm encoded in the benchmark is loop recognition, but the purpose of the paper is to benchmark the languages, not to find loops.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Loop Recognition Benchmarks in C++, Java, Go, Scala (2011... by dang on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @10:56PM (#8045811)
Ok, thanks. We added "Benchmarks" to the title.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Loop Recognition Benchmarks in C++, Java, Go, Scala (2011... by saltcookie on Thursday July 17, 2014 @12:30AM (#8046054)
http://readwrite.com/2011/06/06/cpp-go-java-scala-performanc...

this is the real artical, which just points to the pdf

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Loop Recognition Benchmarks in C++, Java, Go, Scala (2011... by saltcookie on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @10:59PM (#8045823)
That is true, i don't understand y some one changed the tittle
[ Parent | on HN ]