News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why does Outlook map Ctrl+F to Forward instead of Find? by JadeNB on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @03:32PM (#8038491)
My use case for very frequent saving is holding on to pages for later reading when I don't have an Internet connection (at home, as it happens; or, what may be a more common use case, on planes or (some) trains)).
Re:Why does Outlook map Ctrl+F to Forward instead of Find? by 0x0 on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @05:31PM (#8039143)
Would printing to a pdf be a better workflow? Lots of sites seem to break due to external css/js not working for an offline local copy.
Re:Why does Outlook map Ctrl+F to Forward instead of Find? by JadeNB on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @05:53PM (#8039302)
> Would printing to a pdf be a better workflow?

It may be; I just have a foolish built-in mindset that "PDF is big, and HTML is small" (uncontaminated by anything silly like checking the sizes of PDF and HTML versions of the same page). Since I usually only use this to queue up casual reading, it's not very important to me that it be an extremely faithful copy; I just grab the "Print view" if there is one.

Firefox, with "Web page, complete", and Safari, with "Web archive", are both pretty good at grabbing dependencies. If I really want a good mirror, then I use wget.

Re:Why does Outlook map Ctrl+F to Forward instead of Find? by taeric on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @05:10PM (#8039014)
My method for that is not closing the browser. Do you have a workflow where you save to a specific place to see when you are on the train?
Re:Why does Outlook map Ctrl+F to Forward instead of Find? by JadeNB on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @05:55PM (#8039317)
> My method for that is not closing the browser.

The advantages of saving the file over not closing the browser are two:

1. it's persistent across reboots / power failure (a pressing concern on an old machine that sometimes decides it's time for an unannounced reboot);

2. it scales well with the number of articles I want to save—I'd rather have 100 files saved than 100 tabs open, and the former doesn't cause any slow-down.

> Do you have a workflow where you save to a specific place to see when you are on the train?

I'm not sure that I understand the question; sorry.

Re:Why does Outlook map Ctrl+F to Forward instead of Find? by taeric on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @06:15PM (#8039432)
Already the "bookmarks" for most folks is already a dumping ground that they never look at. For myself, I know that if I were saving pages to a spot, I would be in major trouble with just a massively growing pit of pages I'll never slog through.

So, I would think it would be great if you could "triage" pages you wanted to save for later. Even if I could move them from a "to read" to a "read" pile would be awesome. Didn't know if you had any pointers on making that happen.

Edit: I should say, btw, I actually do use my "don't close tabs" for the train. My commutes are typically small, so I don't do large readings.

Re:Why does Outlook map Ctrl+F to Forward instead of Find? by JadeNB on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @06:46PM (#8039585)
> So, I would think it would be great if you could "triage" pages you wanted to save for later. Even if I could move them from a "to read" to a "read" pile would be awesome. Didn't know if you had any pointers on making that happen.

Not really; I do a first, basic sort when saving according to very crude topic (Math, CS, news, …). When I actually read, I treat it essentially as if I were reading online; unless I really enjoy the file, I delete it after reading. If I do enjoy it, I move it to a separate 'permanent' storage area.

One advantage of this over bookmarks for me is that I somehow spend more time looking at my directory tree than my bookmarks, and so am more bothered by an enormous (in the sense of number of files, not size) directory than by my bookmarks becoming, as you say, a massive dumping ground. Thus, having the files on disk somehow seems to cause me to deal with them, either sorting them more carefully or deleting them, much sooner (or, at least, before the end of time :-) ).