News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ITerm2 2.0 by kator on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @12:53PM (#8037537)
I'm in a shell most of my day when not in meetings. I love being able to have a nice full screen with vertical and horizontal splits (Cmd-D or Shift-Cmd-D) with thin lines between each split. Also iTerm helps me keep my hand off my mouse and when I do use my mouse iTerm makes my usage very efficient (double click to copy text .. Cmd-V paste, right-click lots of stuff right in your face on the spot..)

I'm less about tabs and more about splits, with two 24" monitors and my 13" MBP on my desk I can have lots of text space to work with and very little window distraction from window chrome.

Maybe it's just because I'm old fashioned and I love to live on the command prompt (vim -vs- sublime all day long) and I grew up in the era of TTY's and 300 Baud modems.. iTerm feels more natural then Terminal.app, it feels like a terminal someone would use all day long -vs- something you hop in for 20 seconds to type some obscure OSX command you cut-paste'd from some site.

In the past I ran into dumb emulation issues with Terminal.app like wrapping and stuff that didn't work right. iTerm seems to be a "programmers" terminal more then a simple utility to get to the command line.

Re:ITerm2 2.0 by chipotle_coyote on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @02:45PM (#8038232)
I have a terminal open nearly all the time, too! I suppose I tend to just open multiple terminal windows, and resize/organize them with Moom (or just the mouse). I can cycle between them on the keyboard, and Terminal lets me paste with middle click, has context right-click menus, etc. (I only recently noticed it has man page lookup in the right-click menu, and learned that if you option-click anywhere in a Terminal.app window it sends that as a mouse click to the app running inside it!) If I absolutely want panes within the same terminal, I run tmux locally.

Terminal.app used to suck, certainly. I suspect a lot of iTerm users are long-term users who really haven't seen how much better Terminal.app is today than it was five or six years ago.

Re:ITerm2 2.0 by ajtaylor on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @10:49PM (#8040311)
If I could ask an unrelated question, what are you using to power 2 external monitors on your MBP? I have a 30" monitor at $work, but a pair of smaller monitors would be even better.
Re:ITerm2 2.0 by kator on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @12:00AM (#8040501)
Modern MBP's have two thunderbolt plugs.. Thunderbolt to DVI to two Dell U2412M's makes for a nice dev environment if you spend a lot of time in terminals.
Re:ITerm2 2.0 by ajtaylor on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @03:15AM (#8040926)
Ahhh, that would make it simple! I was hoping you were going to recommend a device that would make it work for my single Thunderbolt port MBP.
Re:ITerm2 2.0 by driverdan on Tuesday July 15, 2014 @06:27PM (#8039499)
tmux supports everything you just described.
Re:ITerm2 2.0 by kator on Wednesday July 16, 2014 @12:03AM (#8040510)
Not less then one column character borders.. It has to burn a column to create borders.. And a couple of other laggy issues.. I need to play with tmux more but when on a bunch of different machines going iTerm straight to the box and using splits makes for a more enjoyable experience.

IMHO Arguing about terminal emulators is almost as religious as arguing about languages. Pick what works for you and I won't judge you if you don't judge me.. Now can we get back to solving real problems.. LOL :-)