News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by hunt on Saturday July 05, 2014 @12:33PM (#7992305)
I am impressed by how fast Neovim is coming along. I wonder how much faster it would progress if there were more donations? Perhaps those that use it everyday in their jobs or for personal use could donate the cost of the text editor that (Neo)Vim replaced, e.g. Sublime Text?
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by MetaCosm on Saturday July 05, 2014 @05:27PM (#7993008)
The fact that the money seems to be being spread around seems to be working well for the project.
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by jdonaldson on Sunday July 06, 2014 @02:27AM (#7993927)
The newsletters and general strategy seem great. I was concerned at first that this was a cranky contributor that decided to take his toys and go somewhere else for some superficial feature. After reading the first few updates it's clear that they're initially concerned with the basic foundation of the app (e.g. refactoring, modernization, and testing), which is wildly at odds for a superficial vanity project. I came away thinking that they really love the editor and have its best interests at heart for a modern implementation. Good luck to them!
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by a-b on Saturday July 05, 2014 @01:29PM (#7992460)
Check NeoVim meetup in San Francisco http://www.meetup.com/vim-ed/events/185434372/
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by tokai on Saturday July 05, 2014 @01:46PM (#7992498)
Why hold a competition for colourscheme when it obviously should be Jellybeans?
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by kps on Saturday July 05, 2014 @04:33PM (#7992883)

  > Why hold a competition for colourscheme [...]?
Because it will distract the attention of bikeshedders away from anything actually important.
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by tiziano88 on Saturday July 05, 2014 @02:26PM (#7992585)
s/Jellybeans/Solarized Dark/
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by b3b0p on Saturday July 05, 2014 @02:28PM (#7992591)
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by w1ntermute on Saturday July 05, 2014 @02:45PM (#7992639)
You spelled Zenburn incorrectly.
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by adamors on Saturday July 05, 2014 @02:01PM (#7992530)
You mean Tomorrow right?
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by Bluestrike2 on Saturday July 05, 2014 @02:44PM (#7992637)
Ah, I see what you did there. You typed Jellybeans instead of base16. It's an odd typo, I'll admit, but I've seen worse :).
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by joemccall86 on Saturday July 05, 2014 @03:39PM (#7992768)
You may have spelled xoria256 wrong there.
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by atweiden on Saturday July 05, 2014 @04:21PM (#7992868)
JellyX: A delicious collision of Jellybeans and Xoria256

https://github.com/guns/jellyx.vim

Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by asb on Saturday July 05, 2014 @02:02PM (#7992535)
You mean inkpot.vim.
Re:NeoVim Newsletter Issue #2 by ludamad on Saturday July 05, 2014 @02:22PM (#7992577)
Glad to see this moving along.