News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Lisp is sin. Parent comment

Re:Lisp is sin by fogus on Tuesday September 01, 2009 @11:32AM (#798167)
For some value of "soon"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lisp is sin by radu_floricica on Tuesday September 01, 2009 @12:22PM (#798264)
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-clr/tree/master

http://blog.n01se.net/?p=41

http://clojure.org/todo

As a rule, things move pretty fast in Clojure-land. And in the beginning it was dual-platform, so it's not really a new idea either.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lisp is sin by ynniv on Tuesday September 01, 2009 @04:11PM (#798801)
From [ http://clojure.blip.tv/file/1313398/ ] I got the impression that Clojure on the CLR was back-burner at best. There appears to be only one committer to the CLR source base since February (possibly longer).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lisp is sin by fogus on Tuesday September 01, 2009 @06:54PM (#799109)
I believe the greater push is to write Clojure in Clojure which will (hopefully) facilitate targetting other platforms.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lisp is sin by licoresse on Tuesday September 01, 2009 @08:41PM (#799213)
Yes, like some did with Squeak. You can generate a vm using Squeak itself, so it will easily flow to other places
[ Parent | on HN ]