News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by DINKDINK on Monday June 30, 2014 @06:33PM (#7968113)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namecoin Distributed DNS is the only solution
Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by zanny on Monday June 30, 2014 @07:29PM (#7968313)
And meshnets. DNS is just a layer on top of an already vulnerable IP stack.

IP can work between broad and anonymous mesh nets, but when an IP address can be resolved to a business or person it provides an exploit vector.

Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by walden42 on Monday June 30, 2014 @08:48PM (#7968628)
Like MaidSafe? Are there other alternatives?
Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by livingparadox on Monday June 30, 2014 @08:12PM (#7968501)
It doesn't serve No-IP's market, because No-IP is for frequently changing IP addresses. Namecoin charges for each record change, to my knowledge.
Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by Buge on Tuesday July 01, 2014 @12:23AM (#7969160)
How often are updates necessary? It costs 0.8 cents to update a namecoin domain.
Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by therealunreal on Tuesday July 01, 2014 @12:35AM (#7969177)
It depends on how often a router may disconnect; they typically receive a new IP address every time they connect. It's also a matter of the ISP's policy, some ISP's force a disconnection once per day while others don't.
Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by cookiecaper on Wednesday July 02, 2014 @02:00PM (#7978515)
One of the main reasons to use a dynamic DNS service is because your IP address changes frequently. A service that requires you to pay for each record update is a non-starter for that use case.
Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by runn1ng on Tuesday July 01, 2014 @04:14AM (#7969626)
> It costs 0.8 cents to update a namecoin domain That's not fair to say.

It costs like this because the namecoin price is so low. However, if it was used more, the price would skyrocket.

Re:Microsoft takes down No-IP.com domains by dsl on Monday June 30, 2014 @07:30PM (#7968318)
So malware authors will be able to operate with impunity? As in all things, the solution is somewhere in the middle.