Just from a cursory glance, it appears that Chartjs is entirely free and you can do what you want with it, while Highcharts is not.
Re:New Chart.js beta version launched
by hayksaakian on Sunday June 29, 2014 @10:43PM
(#7963431)
It would be nice if this distinction was stated unambiguously on the front page
here's the license if you were looking for it like I was
Took me ages to find the license, I ended up clicking documentation and still having to search for the word license to find it. I wish it was more prominent on the landing page.
Re:New Chart.js beta version launched
by skeletonjelly on Monday June 30, 2014 @06:35AM
(#7964416)
Highcharts is free for non commercial
Big fan of Highcharts. Like that you can export charts to a png. Big deal for me, don't think chart.js offers anything like that?
Re:New Chart.js beta version launched
by lalwanivikas on Monday June 30, 2014 @02:02AM
(#7963881)
FusionCharts can export charts to PNG, JPG, PDF and SVG. I've been trying both FusionCharts and HighCharts for past few weeks and I can say that I am a bit inclined towards FusionCharts. Had this discussion the other day as well when Epoch[1] was released.
Yep, you can call .toBase64Image() on your chart instance to return a png image encoded as a base 64 data url.
Re:New Chart.js beta version launched
by scrollaway on Sunday June 29, 2014 @06:16PM
(#7962696)
I really like the feel of HighCharts. I've been using HighStock (their financial charts) for traffic analytics graphs and it works really well.
http://www.highcharts.com